MEASURING THE LEVEL OF FRAUD ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: MODEL OF FRAUD TRIANGLE (Case Studies on Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2018)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37932/j.e.v11i1.253Keywords:
Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Fraudulent Financial StatementAbstract
This study aims to measure the level of fraudulent financial statements with the fraud triangle model. The independent variables are pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and the dependent variable is fraudulent financial statements. The population in this study is companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2014-2018 with a sample of 100 companies. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression. The results show that the pressure with proxies the financial stability and financial target and the opportunity with proxy the nature of industry has significant effect on the financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, the opportunity with proxies the ineffective monitoring and rationalization have not significant effect on the financial statement fraudulent.References
ACFE. 2018. “Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.” Report to the Nation’s 10:80.
AICPA. 2002. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit (SAS) No.99. New York: AICPA.
Akbar, Taufiq. 2017. “The Determination of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Causes by Using Pentagon Theory on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 14(5):106–13.
Albrecht, W. Steve, Chad O. Albrecht, Conan C. Albrecht, dan Mark F. Zimbelman. 2012. Fraud Examination. 4th ed. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Annisya, Mafiana, Lindrianasari, & Yuztitya Asmaranti. 2016. “Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond.” Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JBE) 23(1):72–89.
Aviantara, Ryan. 2019. “The BIG 4 Role in Moderating the Detection of Fraud Pentagon Against Fraudulent Financial Reports (Study on Indonesian Public Sector Government Companies).” International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 48(2307–4531):94–107.
Bawekes, Helda F., Aaron MA Simanjuntak, dan Sylvia Christina Daat. 2018. “Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015).” Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah 13(1):114–34.
Beneish, Messod D. 1999. “The Detection of Earnings Manipulation.” Financial Analysts Journal 55(5):24–36.
Center for Audit Quality. 2010. “Deterring and Detecting Financial Reporting Fraud: A Platform for Action.” Washington DC.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement.
Cressey, Donald R. 1953. Other People’s Money; A Study in The Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe: Free Press.
Handoko, Bambang Leo, & Natasya. 2019. “Fraud Diamond Model for Fraudulent Financial Statement Detection.” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 8(3):6865–72.
Holtfreter, K. (2005). Is occupational fraud “typical” white-collar crime? A comparison of individual and organizational characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(4), 353-365.
Husmawati, Pera, Yossi Septriani, Irda Rosita, & Desi Handayani. 2017. “Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Statement (Study on Manufacturing Firms Listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia Period 2013-2016).” International Conference of Applied Science on Engineering, Business, Linguistics and Information Technology (ICo-ASCNITech) (October):45–51.
Indarto, Stefani Lily, & Imam Ghozali. 2016. “Fraud Diamond: Detection Analysis on The Fraudulent Financial Reporting.” Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions 6(4Continued1):116–23.
Jensen, Michael C., & William H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3(4):305–60.
Johnstone, Karla M., Audrey A. Gramling, & Larry E. Rittenberg. 2014. Auditing: A Risk-Based Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Karyono. 2013. Forensic Fraud. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi.
Lou, Yung-I., & Ming-Long Wang. 2009. “Fraud Risk Factor of The Fraud Triangle Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting.” Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 7(2):61–78.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 tahun 2015. 2015. “Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 Tahun 2015 Tentang Praktik Akuntan Publik.” 1–23.
Premananda, Ni Luh Putu Uttari, I. Ketut Budiartha, Herkulanus Bambang Suprasto, dan I. Dewa Nyoman Badera. 2019. “Fraud Diamond Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Study on Indonesian Capital Market).” International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research 47(2):84–95.
Priantara, Diaz. 2017. “Ketika Skandal Fraud Akuntansi Menerpa British Telecom dan PwC.” Warta Ekonomi Online. Diambil 20 Februari 2020 (https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read145257/ketika-skandal-fraud-akuntansi-menerpa-british-telecom-dan-pwc).
Putra, Wahyu Manuhara. 2019. “Analysis of Financial Fraud Using the Fraud Diamond Model with Corporate Governance as The Moderating Variable.” 102(Icaf):163–69.
Putriasih, Ketut, Ni Nyoman Trisna Herawati, dan Made Arie Wahyuni. 2016. “Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2013 – 2015.” e-JournalS1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 6(3).
Rengganis, RR. Maria Yulia Dwi, Maria Mediatrix Ratna Sari, I. G. A. . Budiasih, I. Gde Ary Wirajaya, dan Herkulanus Bambang Suprasto. 2019. “The fraud diamond: element in detecting financial statement of fraud.” International research journal of management, IT and social sciences 6(3):1–10.
Rukmana, Heru Satria. 2018. “Pentagon Fraud Affect on Financial Statement Fraud and Firm Value.” South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business 16(5):118–22.
Santoso, Nanda Trio, & Surenggono. 2018. “Predicting Financial Statement Fraud with Fraud Diamond Model of Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia.” State-of-the-Art Theories and Empirical Evidence 151–63.
Septriyani, Yossi, & Desi Handayani. 2018. “Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon.” Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Bisnis 11(1):11–23.
Setiawati, Erma, & Ratih Mar Baningrum. 2018. “Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon : Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Listed di BEI Tahun 2014-2016.” Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia 3(2):91–106.
Singleton, Tommie, & Aaron J. Singleton. 2010. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Skousen, Christopher J. 2004. “An Empirical Investigation of the Relevance and Predictive Ability of the SAS 99 Fraud Risk Factors.”
Skousen, Christopher J., Kevin R. Smith, & Charlotte J. Wright. 2009. “Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99.” SSRN Electronic Journal (99).
Sugiyono, Prof. 2011. “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.” Alpabeta, Bandung.
Summers, Scott L., & John T. Sweeney. 1998. “Fraudulently Misstated Financial Statements and Insider Trading: An Empirical Analysis.” The Accounting Review 73(1):131–46.
Sunardi, Sunardi, & M. Nuryatno Amin. 2018. “Fraud Detection of Financial Statement by Using Fraud Diamond Perspective.” International Journal of Development and Sustainability 7(3):878–91.
Surjaatmaja, L. 2018. “Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statement Using Fraud Triangle: Capability as Moderating Variable.” KnE Social Sciences 3(10):945–56.
Syahputra, Edi, & Erlina. 2019. “Analysis of The Effect of Diamond Fraud in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud: Empirical Study in Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2010 – 2017.” International Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting and Finance 2(1):1–10.
Syahria, Rizqa, Fariyana Kusumawati, & Adi Darmawan Ervanto. 2019. “Detecting Financial Statement Fraud Using Fraud Diamond (A Study on Banking Companies Listed On the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2016).” Asia Pacific Fraud Journal 4(2).
Syahrul, Yura. 2003. “Bapepam: Kasus Kimia Farma Merupakan Tindak Pidana.” bisnis.tempo.co. Diambil 15 Februari 2020 (https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/33339/bapepam-kasus-kimia-farma-merupakan-tindak-pidana).
Tunggal, Amin Widjaja. 2009. Professional Ethics & Fraud Examination. Jakarta: Harvarindo.
Vona, Leonard W. 2008. Fraud Risk Assessment: Building a Fraud Audit Program. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wahyuni, Wahyuni, & Gideon Setyo Budiwitjaksono. 2017. “Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan.” Jurnal Akuntansi 21(1):47–61.
Wailan’An, Evi Juita, Erlina, & Erwin Abu Bakar. 2019. “Effect of Fraud Diamond on Fraud Financial Statement Detection with Audit Committee as Moderation Variables in Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in The Period of 2015-2017.” International Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Finance 2(2):1–12.
Wareza, Monica. 2019. “Tiga Pilar dan Drama Penggelembungan Dana.” CNBC Indonesia. Diambil 20 Februari 2020 (https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20190329075353-17-63576/tiga-pilar-dan-drama-penggelembungan-dana).
Wells, Joseph T. 2017. Corporate Fraud Handbook. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Yendrawati, Reni, Huda Aulia, & Hendi Yogi Prabowo. 2019. “Detecting the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: an Analysis of Fraud Diamond.” Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal 14(1):43–68.
Yesiariani, Merissa, & Isti Rahayu. 2017. “Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Pengujian dengan Fraud Diamond.” Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia 21(1):49–60.
Yushita, Amanita Novi. 2010. “Earnings Management Dalam Hubungan Keagenan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia 8(1):53–62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Ekobis: Ekonomi Bisnis & Majemen is licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
