Digital Security Transformation Model in Peer-to-Peer Networks for High-Efficiency Smart Campuses

Authors

  • Imam Santoso Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Rahmat Nursiaga Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Alfonso Sabatani Quiko Universitas Teknologi Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37932/jarekom.v1i1.909

Keywords:

Transformation, Digital Security, Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Network, Efficiency, Smart Campus

Abstract

Digital transformation within campus environments via Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks and the Internet of Everything (IoE) integration offers high efficiency and intelligent connectivity, yet introduces significant network security risks. This study analyzes these risks and designs contemporary technology-based security strategies to support Smart Campus systems. Utilizing a Research and Development approach, a hybrid security model based on adaptive encryption and AI-driven monitoring was developed. Experimental results demonstrate a 72% increase in threat detection capabilities and an average attack mitigation response time of 3.4 seconds. This article proposes a digital security transformation model built upon a P2P architecture to enhance network efficiency and resilience. Furthermore, this study examines security strategies, technological innovations, and their implementation impacts on smart campus operational efficiency. Through case studies and network simulations, this article offers a novel contribution to adaptive digital security design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khan, R., et al. (2020). Security Challenges in IoE Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys.

Shafiq, M., et al. (2021). Adaptive Encryption in Smart Environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications.

Zhang, Y. (2022). P2P Network Vulnerabilities. ACM Computing Surveys.

Alrawais, A., et al. (2019). IoT Security in Smart Campus. IEEE Access.

Kumar, S. (2020). Machine Learning for Threat Detection. Elsevier.

Ardiansyah, M., et al. (2022). “Enhancing Digital Security in P2P Smart Campus Network: A Case Study.” Jurnal Teknologi dan Informasi, 10(2), 155–170.

Cybersecurity Ventures. (2024). Global Cybersecurity Threat Report 2024.

Cisco Systems. (2023). Annual Internet Report 2023.

Palo Alto Networks. (2024). Cybersecurity Trends in Higher Education.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.

Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). “Blockchain-based security frameworks in academic networks,” Journal of Cybersecurity, 15(3), 44–59.

Kusnadi, R. (2021). “Desentralisasi Jaringan Digital dalam Smart Campus,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Pendidikan, 11(2), 123–137.

Herlambang, B. (2022). “Penguatan Keamanan Digital di Kampus Berbasis Jaringan Wireless.” Jurnal Komputasi dan Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 88–97.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. (2023). Survei Infrastruktur dan Keamanan Digital Perguruan Tinggi.

Stanford University Research Lab. (2022). Blockchain Integration in Education Networks.

Zhang, Y. et al. (2021). “Secure P2P Communication in Logistics Industry Using AI-based Cryptography.” IEEE Transactions on Network Security, 29(3), 223–235.

Zhou, X., & Gupta, R. (2020). “Peer-to-Peer Security Models: An Overview.” Journal of Network Architecture, 11(2), 45–60.

Published

2025-12-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Digital Security Transformation Model in Peer-to-Peer Networks for High-Efficiency Smart Campuses. (2025). Jurnal Rekayasa Komputer, 1(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.37932/jarekom.v1i1.909

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)