FAKTOR PENENTU KUALITAS AUDIT DI KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK DKI JAKARTA

Authors

  • Momon Momon Universitas Pancasila
  • Widarto Rachbini Universitas Pancasila
  • Amilin Amilin UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37932/ja.v7i2.48

Keywords:

Audit Quality, Auditor Competency, Auditor Independence

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the effect of auditor competence and independence on audit quality. The sample used in this study were 151 samples (KAP) represented by the Auditor in DKI Jakarta. Data analysis uses descriptive and inferential analysis using multiple regression analysis. Hypothesis testing results indicate that there is a significant positive effect on Auditor Competence and Auditor Independence on Audit Quality. These results indicate that the higher (both) Auditor Competency and Auditor Independence, the Audit Quality will increase. Independent auditors should pay attention to their competencies. To improve audit quality, it is necessary to increase the competence of auditors by providing training and certification of expertise that supports the auditor profession in line with continuing professional education (PPL) programs. The role of regulators and accountants' associations (IAPI, IAI) in this case is also very necessary to monitor the implementation of the PPL program for auditors (accountants). Auditors who conduct audits must truly maintain and ensure independence both in fact and in appearance in order to produce quality audits. The existence of regulations that limit the length of the audit of a client conducted by the same public accountant, should also be supported by the KAP to rotate the auditor team, not only limited to the level of partners signing the audit report to further maintain its independence.

References

ACFE, 2012. Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

AAA Financial Accounting Standard Committee. 2000. Commentary: SEC Auditor Independent Requirements.

Accounting Horizons Vol. 15 No 4.

Ainsworth, Murray, Neville Smith, and Anne Millership. 2007. Managing Performance. Jakarta : PT. Bhuana Ilmu Populer

Akuntan Publik dan Kantor Akuntan Publik yang Dibekukan 2009. http://wartawarga.gunadarma.ac.id/2009/10/8-akuntan-publik-dan-kantor-akuntan-publik-yang-dibekukan/ . Diakses tanggal 5 Maret 2015.

Alim, M. N., Hapsari, T., & Purwanti, L. 2007. Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makasar.

Aldhizer, G.R dan James C. Lampe.1997. “Competitive Bidding, Auditor Tenure, and

extent of Single Audit Findings”. The Government Accountants Journal vol.46, pp.45-49.

Arens, et.al. 2012. “Auditing and Assurance Services: an Integrated Approach”. 14th Edition. Pearson-Printice Hall.

Bapepam LK, 2012. Konferensi Pers akhir tahun 2012. http://akuntanonline.com/showdetail.php?mod=art&id=205&t=Dicabut%20Izin%20Praktek%204%20AP%20di%20Pasar%20Modal%20&kat=Auditing . Diakses tanggal 6 Juni 2015.

Bedard, J. (1986). Expertise in auditing: Myth or reality?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(1), 113-131.

Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H., & McGrath, N. T. 1992. Audit quality attributes: The perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users. Auditing, 11(1), 1.

Christiawan, Yulius Jogi. 2003. ”Kompetensi dan Independensi Akuntan Publik. Refleksi Hasil Penelitian Empiris”. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol.4 No. 2 (Nov) Hal. 79-92

De Angelo, L.E. 1981. Auditor Size And Audit Quality. Journal of accounting and economics 3, 183-199. North-holland publishing company

Deis Jr, D. R., & Giroux, G. A. 1992. Determinants of audit quality in the public sector. Accounting Review, 462-479.

Direktori IAPI 2015. http://iapi.or.id

Ghozali, Imam, 2011, Modal Persamaan Struktural dengan Program Partial Least Square, Undip Semarang.

Herawaty, Arleen dan Yulius Kurnia Susanto. 2009. Pengaruh Profesionalisme, Pengetahuan Mendeteksi Kekeliruan, dan Etika Profesi Terhadap Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas Akuntan Publik. JAAI, Volume 13, Nomor 2, Desember 2009, Halaman 211-220

IAPI. 2008. “Kode Etik Profesi Akuntan Publik”.

IAI. 2011. ”Standar Profesi Akuntan Publik”. Indonesia. Salemba Empat.

Jensen, K. L., dan Jeff L. Payne, 2003, Audit Pricing and Audit Quality: the Influence of the Introduction ofthe Price Competition, Working Paper, University of Oklahoma.

Kadhafi, M., Nadirsyah, dan S. Abdullah. 2014. Pengaruh Independensi, Etika dan Standar Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Inspektorat ACEH. Jurnal Akuntansi. Vol. 3. No. 1, pp. 93-103.

Kharismatuti, Norma. Basuki P.H. 2012. Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Internal Auditor BPKP DKI Jakarta). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. Volume 1. Hal. 1-10.

Kisnawati. Baiq. 2012. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Etika Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor Pemerintah di Inspektorat Kabupaten dan Kota se Pulau Lombok). Jurnal Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan. Vol.8. No. 3.

Komang, Ni S,. Kadek Ni S, dan Adi Gede Y. 2014. Pengaruh Profesionalisme Auditor, Etik Profesi, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhada Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Bali). e-Journal S1 Akuntansi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Vol. 2. No 1.

Kurnia, Winda. Dkk. 2014. Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, tekanan waktu, dan etika auditor terhadap kualitas audit. E-jural Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Trisakti. Vol. 1 No. 2. September 2014. Hal 49-67.

Kusharyanti. 2003. Temuan penelitian mengenai kualitas audit dan kemungkinan topik

penelitian di masa datang. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen (Desember).

Lee, Tom & Mary Stone. 1995. Competence and Independence: The congenial Twins Of Auditing?. Journal of business finance and Accounting. 22(8). (December). Pp 1169-1177.

Libby, R., & Frederick, D. M. 1990. Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of Accounting Research, 348-367.

Marxen, D. E. 1990. A behavioral investigation of time budget preparation in a competitive audit environment. Accounting Horizons, 4(2), 47.

Meier, H. H., & Fuglister, J. 1992. How to Improve Audit Quality: Perceptions of Auditors and Clients. The Ohio CPA Journal, 21-24.

Messier, F.W., et.al. (2005). Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Suatu Pendekatan Sistematis. Diterjemahkan oleh Nuri Hinduan. Edisi 4 Buku 1 & 2. Jakarta:Salemba Empat

Muliani, E. Singgih., Rangga, I. Bawono. 2010. Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Professional Care Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Pada Auditor Di Kap “Big Four” Di Indonesia). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII. Purwokerto.

Mulyadi. 2011. Auditing. Penerbit Salemba Empat. Indonesia.

Pamungkas, Bayu. 2010. Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure, Pertimbanngan Tingkat Materialitas, dan Audit Fee terhadap Kualitas Audit. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Pflugrath, G at.al. 2007, “The Impact of Codes of Ethics and Experience on Auditor Judgments”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 566-589

Palmrose, Z, 1986. “The Effect of Non-Audit Services on The Pricing od Audit

Service: Further Evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 405-411.

Republik Indonesia, 2011. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 2011 tentang Akuntan Publik.

Republik Indonesia, 2015. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 tahun 2015 tentang Praktik Akuntan Publik.

Refdi. Kirmizi dan Restu Agusti.2014.Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Kepatuhan pada Kode Etik dan Motivasi terhadap Kualitas Audit Aparat Inspektorat se-Provinsi Riau.Jurnal SOROT Vol 8 hal.1-190: Universitas Riau

Saifudin. 2004. ”Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Kuasieksperimen Pada Auditor Dan Mahasiswa)”. Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana Magister Akuntansi Universitas Diponegoro.

Septriani Yossi. 2012. Pengaruh Independensi dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Studi Kasus Auditor KAP di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal AKuntansi & Manajemen. Vol. 7. No. 2. Hal 78-100.

Skandal Olympus 2011. http://www.antaranews.com/berita/297665/tujuh-orang-ditangkap-karena-skandal-olympus . Diakses tanggal 12 April 2015.

Toshiba scandal puts focus on Japan's cut-price company audits. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/29/us-toshiba-accounting-auditor-idUSKCN0Q32OY20150729 . Diakses tanggal 3 Agustus 2015.

Trotter,R.J., 1986, “The Mystery of Mastery”, Psychology Today (Juli) hal. 32-38 dalam Abdolmohammadi dkk, “A Framework for Analysis of Characteristic of Audit Experts”, Universitas Trisakti (Agustus).

Tubbs, R. M., Messier Jr, W. F., & Knechel, W. R. 1990. Recency effects in the auditor's belief-revision process. Accounting Review, 452-460.

Tubbs, Richard M. 1992. The Effect of Experience on The Auditor’s Organization and Amount of Knowledge: Journal of Accounting Review, Vol 67 (October): 783-801.

Wati, L.N. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Terapan dengan Aplikasi SPSS, EVIEWS, SmartPLS, dan AMOS. Jakarta: Pustaka Amri.

Wedemeyer, P. D. 2010. A discussion of auditor judgment as the critical component in audit quality–A practitioner's perspective. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(4), 320-333.

Wicaksono, Monot. 2015. Pengaruh Kompetensi Dan Independensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Etika Auditor Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi Pada Bawasda Pemerintah Daerah

Di Ex-Karesidenan Surakarta Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak. Vol. 15 No. 02.

Widiastuti, Harjanti. 2002. Peer Review: Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Jasa Firma Akuntan Publik. Akuntansi dan Investasi Vol. 3. Hal. 51-60.

Wooten, T.C. 2003. “Research about Audit Quality”, CPA Journal, vol 73, 1, 48-64

Yohanes Enho. 2014. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Motivasi Aparat Inspektorat Dalam Audit Operasional terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Inspektorat Kota Tangerang. Tesis. Universitas Indonesia. Depok.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-05